Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy , 2359 University of Prince Edward Island , 550 University Ave , Charlottetown , PE C1A 4P3 , Canada
Abstract
Abstract
This paper addresses the views of R.G. Collingwood and Theodor Adorno on the role of amusement and art in what each of them saw as the crisis of contemporary Western civilization. We will begin by showing how the aesthetic theories of Collingwood and Adorno develop out of their shared concerns about the harmful effects of amusement and bad art on the consciousness of human beings. We will argue that a productive dialogue between these two figures clarifies that the value of art consists in its ability to remedy the corruption of the mental and emotional lives of human beings and in helping to fashion a different social and political order. As part of this, we will show how, despite appearances, Adorno’s aesthetic cognitivism and Collingwood’s expression theory of art agree with and complement one another in significant ways. In establishing this point, this work will leave us with an understanding of art that is more comprehensive and better equipped to address the crisis of contemporary Western society.
Reference12 articles.
1. Adorno, T. W. 1970/1997. Aesthetic Theory. Robert Hullot-Kentor (Ed. and trans.). London: Continuum.
2. Adorno, T. W. 1991a. “Resignation.” In The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture, edited by J. M. Bernstein, 198–203. London: Routledge.
3. Adorno, T. W. 1991b. “The Schema of Mass Culture.” In The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture, edited by J. M. Bernstein, 61–97. London: Routledge.
4. Bernstein, J., et al.. 2013. “Theoretical Positions: Critical Theory.” In Beyond the Aesthetic and the Anti-Aesthetic, edited by J. Elkins, and H. Montgomery, 67–76. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
5. Boucher, D. 1989. The Social and Political Thought of R.G. Collingwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.