Affiliation:
1. Australian National University Canberra ACT 2601 , Canberra Australia
Abstract
Abstract
In Part III of The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith declares that people desire to be both esteemed and to be esteem-worthy, but that the latter desire both does and ought to take priority. The main object of this paper is to challenge that priority claim—mainly in its descriptive aspect. If that claim were true, then: agents would be at pains to eliminate any distortions in their self-evaluations; and the effects of the size (especially of total secrecy) and the character of audience on behaviour would be second-order. Empirical evidence suggests otherwise. Moreover the normative claim seems to overlook some advantages of inflated self-evaluation; and to allow no independent room for norms of modesty/humility.
Subject
Law,Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science
Reference15 articles.
1. Adler,N.,& Stewart. J. (2004). Self-esteem. Psychological Working Group. MacArthur Foundation. Research Network on Socio-economic Status and Health.
2. Allport, G. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Holt: New York.
3. Brennan, G. (2017). Self-Esteem. In T. Christiano, I. Crepell, & J. Knight (Eds.), Morality, governance and social institutions: Reflections on Russell Hardin. Ch. 3. Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
4. Brennan, G., & Pettit, P. (2004). The economy of esteem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Cross, P. (1977). Not can, but will, college teaching be improved? New Directions for Higher Education, Spring, 1–15.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献