No-show paradox in Slovak party-list proportional system

Author:

Dančišin Vladimír1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Political Science, University of Prešov, Faculty of Arts , 17. novembra 1 , Prešov , Slovak Republic

Abstract

Abstract The phenomenon of the paradoxes of the largest remainders methods has been studied by numerous authors. Nevertheless, the examples presented in their studies do not deal with the case where a party’s possible additional votes can directly lead to a loss in the party’s number of representatives. This paradox, which can be called the no-show apportionment paradox, has not previously been mentioned in the literature. It is based on the assumption that a voter’s favourite party may lose a seat if the voter votes honestly but get more seats if he or she abstains. The article gives simple examples illustrating the no-show paradox in a party-list proportional representation electoral system using the quota method of apportionment. In these situations it would be better for the party if some of their voters abstained, otherwise it would lose one or more seats.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science

Reference16 articles.

1. Austen-Smith, D., & Banks, J. (1991). Monotonicity in electoral systems. American Political Science Review, 85(2), 531-537.

2. Balinski, M. L., & Young, H. P. (2001). Fair representation. Meeting the ideal of one man, one vote. Washington, D. C.: Brookings.

3. Brams, S. J., & Fishburn, P. C. (1984). Some logical defects of the single transferable vote. In A. Lijphart & B. Grofman (Eds.), Choosing an electoral system: Issues and alternatives (pp. 147-151). New York: Praeger.

4. Doron, G., & Kronick, R. (1977). Single transferable vote: An example of a perverse social choice function. American Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 303-311.

5. Felsenthal, D. S. (2010). Review of paradoxes afflicting various voting procedures where one out of m candidates (m ≥ 2) must be elected. Paper presented at the Leverhulme Trust sponsored 2010 Voting Power in Practice workshop held at Chateau du Baffy, Normandy, France, 30 July – 2 August, 2010.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Paradoxes;Studies in Choice and Welfare;2023

2. The elimination paradox: apportionment in the Democratic Party;Public Choice;2018-09-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3