Abstract
AbstractIn an artificial language-learning task, two groups of English and French participants learned one of two language rules: 1) stress the first heavy (CVC) syllable, else the first syllable, or, 2) stress the first light (CV) syllable, else the first syllable. French and English participants were chosen to compare learning outcomes by speakers of different native stress systems, fixed and variable. Participants were trained on the target language by listening to a set of nonsense familiarization words exemplifying the stress rule. This was followed by a forced-choice task to choose the correct version of the words they had just learned. Following the training procedure, participants were tested on novel words with the same stress pattern to which they were familiarized. The result of the novel word testing was that the natural rule with stress on heavy syllables was learned significantly better than the unnatural, stress light syllables, rule. To account for the learnability of both the natural and the unnatural rules, I argue for the interaction of a general cognitive mechanism that facilitates learning in general and a domain-specific language mechanism that can access universal phonological principles to aid in learning a natural language rule.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference45 articles.
1. Learning phonology with substantive bias : an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization;Wilson;Cognitive Science,2006
2. From usage to grammar : The mind s response to repetition;Bybee;Language,2006
3. A naturalness bias in learning stress;Carpenter;Phonology,2010
4. A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages International Review of Linguistics in Language;DeLattre;Applied Teaching,1966
5. Statistical learning by - month - old infants;Saffran;Science,1996
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献