Abstract
Heritage has been defined differently in European contexts. Despite differences, a common challenge for historic urban landscape management is the integration of tangible and intangible heritage. Integration demands an active view of perception and human-landscape interaction where intangible values are linked to specific places and meanings are attached to particular cultural practices and socio-spatial organisation. Tangible and intangible values can be examined as part of a system of affordances (potentialities) a place, artefact or cultural practice has to offer. This paper discusses how an ‘affordance analysis’ may serve as a useful tool for the management of historic urban landscapes.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Subject
Geography, Planning and Development
Reference79 articles.
1. Agrawal , A. (2001), ‘Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources’, World Development, 29 (10), pp. 1649-1672.
2. Ahmad , Y. (2006), ‘The Scope and Definitions of Heritage: From Tangible to Intangible’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12 (3), pp. 292-300.
3. Alonso Gonzalez , P. (2014), ‘From a Given to a Construct’, Cultural Studies, 28 (3), pp. 359-390.
4. Alves , S., Aspinall , P. A., Ward Thompson , C., Sugiyama , T., Brice , R. and Vickers, A. (2008), ‘Preferences of Older People for Environmental Attributes of Local Open Space’, [in:] Lefebvre , R. C. (ed.), Social Marketing: Deepening and Expanding the Impact, Vol. 6, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
5. Appadurai , A. (1986), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献