Same Evidences, Different Interpretations – A Comparison of the Conflict Index between the Interstate Dyadic Events Data and Militarized Interstate Disputes Data in Peace-Conflict Models

Author:

Lin Scott Y.1,Seiglie Carlos2

Affiliation:

1. 1Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University, 64 Wanshou Road, Taipei City 11666, Taiwan

2. 2Department of Economics, Rutgers University, Hill Hall 803, 360 Dr. Martin L. King Blvd., Newark, NJ 07102, USA

Abstract

AbstractStudying the determinants of international conflict, researchers have found a series of influential variables, but few have addressed the robustness of the results to changes in the definition of the dependent variable, conflict. The two main sources for operationalizing conflict in empirical work are data on militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) and events data. In this paper, we find that a χ2-test indicates a correlation between events data and MIDs data. However, detailed regression analysis indicates that there are some contradictory findings depending on whether we use events data as opposed to MIDs data to measure conflict.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science

Reference144 articles.

1. Militarized Interstate Disputes Rationale Coding Rules and Empirical Patterns and vol no pp;Jones;Conflict Management Peace Science,1996

2. OECD Organisation for Economic Co - operation and Preventing Violence War and State Collapse : The Future of Conflict Early Warning and Response OECD Paris;Development,2009

3. Processes Crises of vol no pp;Hewitt;International Journal Conflict Resolution,2003

4. Interaction Survey Project Inter - University Consortium for Political MI;McClelland;World Event Social Research Ann Arbor,1978

5. Cooperation Scale for Events Data of vol no pp;Goldstein;Conflict Journal Conflict Resolution,1992

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3