Affiliation:
1. University of Graz , Graz , Austria
Abstract
Abstract
The syntactic position of information foci is the most vividly discussed issue in recent literature on focus in Spanish. An interesting aspect of this discussion is that the diverging views typically correlate with diverging methods: Authors who rely on their intuitions as native speakers typically assume that information foci are limited to the final position, while authors using experimental methods typically argue (based on their experimental data) that information foci are not limited to the final position. The present paper contributes to this debate by adding a new data type, namely corpus data. The main empirical finding of our corpus study is that information foci appear most frequently in final position but are not limited to the final position. The latter finding is in line with comparable experimental studies, but the preference for the final position in our corpus data is not found in all experimental studies. Further, our results challenge the common view in the introspection-based literature according to which the information focus needs to be in final position in Spanish. In addition to this empirical contribution we offer a reflection on the merits of corpus data in this domain of linguistic research.
Reference105 articles.
1. Aarts, Bas. 2000. Corpus linguistics, Chomsky and fuzzy tree fragments. In Christian Mair & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory: Papers from the twentieth international conference on English language research on computerized corpora, 5–13. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
2. Adli, Aria. 2011. On the relation between acceptability and frequency. In Esther Rinke & Tanja Kupisch (eds.), The development of grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change, 383–404. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Adli, Aria. 2015. What you like is not what you do: Acceptability and frequency in syntactic variation. In Aria Adli, Marco García García & Göz Kaufmann (eds.), Variation in language: System- and usage-based approaches, 173–200. Berlin: de Gruyter.
4. Bosque, Ignacio. 1999. On focus versus wh-movement. The case of Caribbean Spanish. Sophia Linguistica 44–45. 1–32.
5. Bosque, Ignacio & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach. 2009. Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.