Time Is Running. Ancient Greek Chronography and the Ancient Near East

Author:

Kellner Angelika1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Ancient History and Ancient Near Eastern Studies , University of Innsbruck , Langer Weg 11 , Innsbruck , Austria

Abstract

Abstract The article explores the question whether there was a possible dialogue between ancient Greek and Mesopotamian chronography. This is an interesting albeit challenging subject due to the fragmentary preservation of the Greek texts. The idea that cuneiform tablets might have influenced the development of the genre in Greece lingers in the background without having been the subject of detailed discussion. Notably the Neo-Assyrian limmu list has been suggested as a possible blueprint for the Athenian archon list. In order to examine this topic further, a thorough analysis of ancient Greek chronography starting in the second half of the fifth century BC, when eponymous dates in various literary compositions begin to appear, is required. A close examination of the fragmentary evidence shows how difficult it is to trace the supposed annalistic style in the local histories of Athens (Atthides). In the Neo-Assyrian Empire, the eponymous limmu officials served as the chronological backbone, but there remains a huge time gap between the seventh century cuneiform manuscripts and the Athenian archon list from the fifth century. A comparison of the Neo-Assyrian Eponymous Chronicles with the preserved Greek chronographic traditions in Eusebius’ chronicle (fourth century AD) shows that the similarity is mainly confined to an abbreviated style, as the entries clearly point to the different cultural and political settings. Apart from the Neo-Assyrian sources, the Neo- and Late-Babylonian chronicles deserve further attention in the present inquiry. Looking for a connection with ancient Greek chronography in the fifth century, the lack of wholly preserved texts on both sides in the corresponding time constitutes an unsurmountable obstacle. Presenting and scrutinising the textual evidence both for ancient Greek and for Mesopotamian chronography enables an improved understanding of similarities and differences alike. To exemplify this point, Greek and Akkadian temple histories serve as test cases.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Materials Chemistry

Reference190 articles.

1. Adalι, S. The Scourge of God. Helsinki: Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, 2011.

2. Adler, W. “Eusebius’ chronicle and its legacy.” In Eusebius, Christianity and Judaism, edited by F. Attridge and G. Hata, 467–491. Leiden: Brill, 1992.

3. Alexander, J. “Was Cleisthenes an Athenian archon?” CJ 54 (1958/9): 307–314.

4. Ambaglio D. Lʼopera storiografica die Ellanico di Lesbo. Pisa: Giardini editori e stampatori in Pisa, 1980.

5. Bagg, A. “Asarhaddon” In Das wissenschaftliche Bibellexikon, edited by M. Bauks, K. Koenen and S. Alkier. http://www.bibelwissenschaft.de/stichwort/13973/. 2008. Accessed Jul. 7, 2017.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3