Affiliation:
1. Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf , Institute for Competition Law , Düsseldorf , Germany
Abstract
AbstractThe zero risk weight privilege for European sovereign debt in the current capital adequacy requirements for credit institutions incentivises credit institutions to acquire and hold sovereign debt. However, it also poses a significant risk to the stability of the banking system and thus the financial system as a whole. It is argued that this privilege should not only be abolished due to the risk it entails but that it is also non conformant with EU primary law. Art. 124 TFEU prohibits privileged access of the EU and Member States' public sector to financial institutions except for prudential considerations. The protective purpose of Art. 124 TFEU to ensure sound budgetary policies by subjecting public borrowing to the same rules as borrowing by other market participants is thwarted by the uniform zero risk weight privilege. Further, as this privilege does not take into account the varying creditworthiness of the individual Member States it does not promote the soundness of financial institutions so as to strengthen the soundness of the financial system as whole, but rather endangers systemic stability. The zero risk weight privilege is therefore not based on prudential considerations and hence violates Art. 124 TFEU.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference79 articles.
1. Abel, Jeannette. 2019. The Resolution of Sovereign Debt Crises: Instruments, Inefficiencies and Options for the Way Forward, Dissertation. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
2. Acharya, Viral, Itamar Drechsler, and Philipp Schnabl. 2014. “A Pyrrhic Victory? Bank Bailouts and Sovereign Credit Risk.” The Journal of Finance LXIX (6): 2689–739.
3. Acharya, Viral, and Sascha Steffen. 2015. “The ‘Greatest’ Carry Trade Ever? Understanding Eurozone Bank Risks.” Journal of Financial Economics 115: 215–36.
4. Admati, A., DeMarzo, P.M., Hellwig, M.F., and Pfleiderer, P.C. 2013. “Fallacies, Irrelevant Facts, and Myths in the Discussion of Capital Regulation: Why Bank Equity is not Socially Expensive”. Max Planck Society, Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Bonn 2013/23. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2349739.
5. Amtenbrink, Fabian. 2018. “Chapter 26: Economic and Monetary Union.” In The Law of the European Union, edited by Pieter Jan Kuijper, Fabian Amtenbrink, Curtin Deirdre, Bruno de Witte, Alison McDonnel, and Stefaan van den Bogaert, 5th ed. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献