Affiliation:
1. Department of English and Philosophy , Idaho State University , Pocatello , Idaho , USA
Abstract
Abstract
The Parmenides has been unduly overlooked in discussions of hypothesis in Plato. It contains a unique method for testing first principles, a method I call ‘exploring both sides’. The dialogue recommends exploring the consequences of both a hypothesis and its contradictory and thematizes this structure throughout. I challenge the view of Plato’s so-called ‘method of hypothesis’ as an isolated stage in Plato’s development; instead, the evidence of the Parmenides suggests a family of distinct hypothetical methods, each with its own peculiar aim. Exploring both sides is unique both in its structure and in its aim of testing candidate principles.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference68 articles.
1. Allen, R. E. 1997. Plato’s Parmenides. New Haven: Yale University Press.
2. Benson, H. 2015. Clitophon’s Challenge: Dialectic in Plato’s Meno, Phaedo, and Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Brisson, L. 1999. Platon, Parménide. Traduction Inédite, Introduction et Notes Par Luc Brisson, 2nd ed. Paris: Flammarion.
4. Brown, L. 1994. “The Verb “To Be” in Greek Philosophy.” In Language, edited by S. Everson, 212–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brown, L. 2010. “Definition and Division in Plato’s Sophist.” In Definition in Greek Philosophy, edited by D. Charles, 151–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.