Affiliation:
1. Philosophy, Sorbonne Université, Centre Léon Robin , 1 rue Victor Cousin , Paris , 75005 , France
Abstract
Abstract
In this article, I claim that the treatise known as περὶ πνεύματος/De spiritu (481a-486b Bekker) was written by Theophrastus. My overall argument unfolds in three stages: first, I briefly summarize the arguments against De spiritu’s authenticity in Aristotle’s corpus. This summary will lead to my first argument which uses the very same reasons that prove the non-Aristotelian authorship to claim the Theophrastean one, in particular linguistic aspects of the text (§2). Next, I will focus on chronology, by discussing the mention of one Aristogenes to show that Aristotle could not have known this individual (§3). Third and last, I will examine various aspects of the work that demonstrate stylistic and argumentative connections (§4), as well as doctrinal affinities with the works of Theophrastus, although some have attributed it to Strato (§5). On the basis of these arguments, I conclude that the weight of the evidence makes On Breath a work by Theophrastus (or his circle) rather than one composed by Aristotle.
Reference55 articles.
1. Baltussen, H. 2000. Theophrastus against the Presocratics and Plato. Peripatetic Dialectic in the De Sensibus. Leiden: Brill.
2. Baltussen, H. 2015a. “Understanding Odours in Probl. 12–13: Peripatetic Problems Concerning the Elusive Sense of Smell.” The Aristotelian Problêmata: Philosophical and Scientific Investigations, edited by R. Mayhew, 172–89. Leiden: Brill.
3. Baltussen, H. 2015b. “Strato of Lampsacus as a Reader of Plato’s Phaedo: His Critique of the Soul’s Immortality.” Ancient Readings of Plato’s Phaedo, edited by S. Delcomminette, P. d’Hoine, and M.-A. Gavray, 37–62. Leiden: Brill.
4. Battegazzore, A. 1989. “La posizione di Teofrasto tra metafisica e fisica.” Epistemologia 12: 49–72.
5. Berryman, S. 1996. Rethinking Aristotelian Teleology: The Natural Philosophy of Strato of Lampsacus. Dissertation: The University of Texas at Austin.