Affiliation:
1. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas , Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , Mexico City , Mexico
Abstract
Abstract
This paper deals with the Stoic concept of misprinted representation (φαντασία παρατυπωτική), which has received little attention compared to other concepts of Stoic epistemology and philosophy of mind. I aim at showing that a better understanding of this concept is important for grasping some elements of the Stoic account of mental representations that have been ignored or misunderstood in modern Stoic scholarship. First, by clarifying the status of the misprinted representation as a genuine representation, we can understand what it means (and does not mean) to say, from the Stoic point of view, that the intentional object of a representation is the external object that caused it. Second, by understanding this issue, we obtain some resources to deal with the ambiguity of the preposition ἀπό in the definition of cognitive representation. Thus, the concept of misprinted representation proves to be important for appropriately understanding the Stoic concepts of representation and cognitive representation.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference28 articles.
1. Annas, J. 1990. “Stoic Epistemology.” In Companions to Ancient Thought 1: Epistemology, edited by S. Everson, 184–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Backhouse, T. 2000. “Antipater of Tarsus on False ‘Phantasiai’ (PBerol Inv. 16545).” Papiri filosofici. Miscellanea di Studi 3: 7–31.
3. Bett, R. 2005. Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Boeri, M. D., and R. Salles. 2014. Los filósofos estoicos: Ontología, Lógica, Física y Ética. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.
5. Bury, R. G. 1935. Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicias. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.