Affiliation:
1. Dipartimento di Scienze Storiche Geografiche e dell’Antichità , 154838 Università degli Studi di Padova , Padova , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
This paper studies an argument in the prologue of the Charmides which defends the view that it is impossible to cure the body independently of the soul. I argue that Socrates is committed to an account of the psychē as an embodied soul, causally responsible for the biological condition of the body. Furthermore, the prescription of kaloi logoi as a treatment for the soul’s biological failures suggests that Socrates appears to initially regard the ethical and biological dimensions of the soul as intimately connected. But I also show that Socrates is unable to maintain this position consistently throughout the passage. A similar conflation of functions can be traced in R. X.608d–611a.
Reference32 articles.
1. Anagnostopoulos, G. 1972. “Review of T. M. Robinson, Plato’s Psychology (1970).” Journal for the History of Philosophy 10: 217–21. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.1425.
2. Betegh, G. 2021. “Plato on Illness in the Phaedo, the Republic, and the Timaeus.” In Plato’s Timaeus. Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium Platonicum Pragense, edited by C. Jorgenson, F. Karfík, and Š. Špinka, 228–58. Leiden: Brill.
3. Bostock, D. 1988. Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Brennan, T. Unpublished. “The Book X argument for the Immortality of the Soul (608d-611a).”
5. Broadie, S. 2001. “Soul and Body in Plato and Descartes.” In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 101, 295–308.