Affiliation:
1. The University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia
Abstract
Abstract
Ancient Athenian women worked in industries ranging from woolworking and food sales to metalworking and medicine; Socrates’ mother was a midwife. The argument for the inclusion of women in the guardian class must be read in light of this historical reality, not least because it allows us retain an important manuscript reading and construe the passage as relying on an inductive generalization rather than a possibly circular argument. Ultimately, Plato fails to fully capitalize on the resources he has for a more egalitarian conclusion than the one he settles on, which regards women as “lesser than” yet “similar to” men.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference53 articles.
1. Annas, J. 1976. “Plato’s Republic and Feminism.” Philosophy 51 (197): 307–21, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819100019355.
2. Blok, J. 1987. “Sexual Asymmetry. A Historiographical Essay.” In Sexual Asymmetry: Studies in Ancient Society, edited by J. Blok, and P. Mason, 1–57. Amsterdam: Gieben.
3. Blok, J. 2004. “Recht und Ritus der Polis.” Historische Zeitschrift 278 (1): 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1524/hzhz.2004.278.jg.1.
4. Blok, J. 2017. Citizenship in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Blok, J. 2019. “An Athenian Woman’s Competence: The Case of Xenokrateia.” Eugesta 8: 1–48, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7058728.