Abstract
Abstract
Transformative theories of what distinguishes human beings from animals face the problem of conceptually managing the transition from animal to human. This paper will show that this transition contains logical problems that are more rhetorically glossed over than logically solved by the concept of second nature. In the first part, I develop two main concepts of transformative theories, namely that of Hinzutreten (additive capacities occurring in humans) and that of Verwandeltsein (humans already being of a different kind), before outlining in the second part Helmuth Plessner’s anthropological approach as one that elaborates not a transformation, but a holistic difference in the structure of human life as well as a non-metaphysical process of nature’s self-differentiation in human beings as opposed to animals.
Reference17 articles.
1. Boyle, M. (2016), Additive Theories of Rationality: A Critique, in: European Journal of Philosophy 24.3, 527–555.
2. Edinger, S. (2017), Das Politische in der Ontologie der Person. Helmuth Plessners Philosophische Anthropologie im Verhältnis zu den Substanzontologien von Aristoteles und Edith Stein, Berlin u. Boston, Mass.
3. Edinger, S. (2022), Negative Anthropologie bei Plessner und Adorno. Theoretische Grundlagen – Geschichtsphilosophie – Moderne-Kritik, Berlin u. Boston, Mass.
4. Feige, D. M. (2022), Die Natur des Menschen. Eine dialektische Anthropologie, Berlin.
5. Gehlen, A. (1993), Der Mensch (= Gesamtausgabe 3), hg. v. Rehberg, K.-S. Textkritische Edition unter Einbeziehung des gesamten Textes der ersten Auflage von 1940. Teilband 1, Frankfurt am Main.