Crusius über die Vernünftigkeit des Wollens und die Rolle des Urteilens

Author:

Schierbaum Sonja1

Affiliation:

1. Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Institut für Philosophie , Josef-Stangl-Platz 2 , Würzburg ; Germany

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I consider the relevance of judgment for practical considerations by discussing Christian August Crusius’s conception of rational desire. According to my interpretation of Crusius’s distinction between rational and non-rational desire, we are responsible at least for our rational desires insofar as we can control them. And we can control our rational desires by judging whether what we want complies with our human nature. It should become clear that Crusius’s conception of rational desire is normative in that we necessarily desire things that are compatible with our nature, such as our own perfection. Therefore, a desire is rational if the desired object is apt to satisfy the desires compatible with our nature. From a contemporary perspective, such a normative conception of rational desire might not appear very attractive; it is apt, however, to stimulate a debate on the normative criteria and the role of judgment for rational desire, which is the ultimate aim of this paper.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Philosophy

Reference30 articles.

1. Alvarez, M. (2010), Kinds of Reasons. An Essay in the Philosophy of Action, Oxford.

2. Baker, D. (2017), The verdictive organization of desire, in: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47.5, 589–612.

3. Crusius, C. A. (1964), Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten, wiefern sie den zufälligen entgegengesetzet werden [1745] (= Die philosophischen Hauptwerke 2), hg. v. Tonelli, G., Hildesheim.

4. Crusius, C. A. (1969), Anweisung, vernünftig zu leben, darinnen nach Erklärung der Natur des menschlichen Willens, die natürlichen Pflichten und allgemeinen Klugheitslehren im richtigen Zusammenhange vorgetragen werden [1767] (= Die philosophischen Hauptwerke 1), hg. v. Tonelli, G., Hildesheim.

5. Crusius, C. A. (1965), Weg zur Gewißheit und Zuverläßigkeit der menschlichen Erkenntniß [1747] (= Die philosophischen Hauptwerke 3), hg. v. Tonelli, G., Hildesheim.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3