Affiliation:
1. Universität Potsdam, Institut für Philosophie , Am Neuen Palais 10 , Potsdam Germany
Abstract
AbstractIn which sense can human beings be conceived as social animals? To elucidate this question, the present paper (I) distinguishes the logical sociality of all living beings from the material sociality of social animals and the political sociality of self-conscious social animals. (II) The self-conscious political sociality that characterises the human genus-being requires a complex interplay of first and second person through which alone we can participate in our form of life and determine its content. (III) The human form of life thus constituted is characterised by a particularly open, and at the same time precarious, membership which involves specific forms of vulnerability and power. (IV) Against this background, forms of objective spirit are necessary which grant us a generalized recognition and relieve us from the contingency of each particular second-personal recognition, without abandoning the openness of the sociality of the human form of life. This double requirement has led to paradoxical institutions in modern society which strive to protect and ensure the sociality of the human form of life precisely by naturalising and individualising our access to it.
Reference33 articles.
1. Arendt, H. (2015), Ursprünge und Elemente totaler Herrschaft, München u. Zürich.
2. Aristoteles (2012), Politik, übers. v. Schütrumpf, E., Hamburg.
3. Cavell, S. (1979), The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy, New York u. Oxford.
4. Cavell, S. (2002), The Avoidance of Love. A Reading of King Lear, in: Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays (Updated Edition), Cambridge, 267–353
5. Derrida, J. (2010), Das Tier, das ich also bin, Wien.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献