Affiliation:
1. Institute for Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute), Russian Academy of Sciences, Bolshoy Karetny per. 19, build.1, Moscow 127051, RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Abstract
Abstract
To date, there are no generally accepted optotypes for monitoring visual acuity. All common optotypes are not completely suitable for some reasons. The tasks requiring visual monitoring - investigation of visual development, early diagnostics, assessment of treatment - impose heavy demands on the test stimuli. They must be: (1) suitable for patients of any age; (2) convenient for repeatable examinations; and (3) accurate enough for revealing the smallest physiologically significant changes of visual acuity. From theoretical consideration, one could conclude that the optotypes for monitoring visual acuity should be designed for measuring visual resolution but not recognition, unlike most popular optotypes. The best optotypes for visual resolution are gratinglike stimuli whose recognition could only be based on the high frequency part of the Fourier spectrum around the characteristic frequency (not on the low-frequency components). On the basis of theoretical analysis we elaborated modified 3-bar optotypes, which minimise the possibility of using low-frequency cues for stimulus recognition. In this paper we present the results of theoretical and experimental comparison of these optotypes with the two widely used ones: tumbling-E and standard 3-bar targets. According to the data obtained, our modified optotypes seem to be better than other investigated ones for monitoring visual acuity.
Reference32 articles.
1. Anderson, R. S., Thibos, L. N. (1999a). The relationship between acuity for gratings and for tumbling-E letters in peripheral vision. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A, 16, 2321-2333.10.1364/JOSAA.16.002321
2. Anderson, R. S., Thibos, L. N. (1999b). Sampling limits and critical bandwidth for letter discrimination in peripheral vision. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A, 16, 2334-2342.10.1364/JOSAA.16.002334
3. Bailey, I. L., Lovie, J. E. (1976). New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Amer. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt., 53, 740-745.
4. Bennett, A. G. (1964). Ophthalmic test types. A review of previous work and discussions on some controversial questions. Brit. J. Physiol. Opt., 22 (4), 238-271.
5. Bondarko, V. M., Danilova, M. V. (1997). What spatial frequency do we use to detect the orientation of a Landolt C? Vis. Res., 37, 2153-2156.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献