Affiliation:
1. Political Science Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real, Vari Hall, Santa Clara, 95053-4345 California USA
Abstract
Abstract
This paper offers a new interpretation of Nietzsche’s “sovereign individual,” which appears in the second treatise of his 1887 On the Genealogy of Morality. I argue that Nietzsche’s presentation of that figure’s sovereignty is much more ambiguous than has hitherto been recognized. In contrast to scholars who argue that he is either completely free from moral conscience or entirely subservient to it, I argue that he is neither completely autonomous nor heteronomous. He surpasses the need for the enforcement of custom only by internalizing it, i. e. by developing a conscience. This positions him as a crucial link in Nietzsche’s understanding of the human being’s dependence on morality. Attending to the sovereign individual’s ambiguities reveals Nietzsche’s skepticism about the possibility of autonomy within the political community.
Reference30 articles.
1. Acampora, Christa Davis: “On Sovereignty and Overhumanity: Why It Matters How We Read Nietzsche’s Genealogy GM II: 2,” in Christa Davis Acampora (ed.), Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals: Critical Essays, Lanham, MD 2006, 156–70
2. Ansell-Pearson, Keith: “Nietzsche on Autonomy and Morality: The Challenge to Political Theory,” Political Studies 39 (1991), 270–86
3. Berkowitz, Peter: Nietzsche: The Ethics of an Immoralist, Cambridge, MA 1996
4. Brusotti, Marco: “Die Autonomie des ‘souveränen Individuums’ in Nietzsches Genealogie der Moral,” Nietzsche-Studien 48 (2019), 26–48
5. Brusotti, Marco: “Die ‘Selbstverkleinerung des Menschen’ in der Moderne: Studie zu Nietzsches Zur Genealogie der Moral,” Nietzsche-Studien 21 (1992), 81–136
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献