Affiliation:
1. Cornell University German Studies 183 Goldwin Smith Hall Ithaca USA
Abstract
Abstract
Nietzsche’s views regarding suicide are usually interpreted as a response to Christian, Kantian, and Schopenhauerian ethics. Here, they are defended on the basis of his notion of life as an aesthetic phenomenon in order to provide extramoral responses to such challenges as the following: a) whether the self can deliver the right kind of judgment regarding her life, b) how suicide can be considered an empowerment of the will, and c) whether suicide can be considered an exercise of freedom by the subject who thereby cancels the very grounds and means for will and action. Reconstructed as a response to Hegel’s argument against suicide on the grounds that one is not the master of oneself and that one therefore lacks the proper means to judge one’s life, Nietzsche’s position provides the epistemic footing to ground an alternate notion of self-mastery as well as the necessary insight regarding one’s life. It is shown that this reading of Nietzsche’s argument is in alignment with his non-dualism and expressivist views regarding agency. Finally, a response is formulated to the socially-grounded arguments prohibiting suicide on the basis of this reading of Nietzsche’s position.
Reference37 articles.
1. Alznauer, Mark: “Ethics and History in Hegel’s Practical Philosophy,” The Review of Metaphysics 65/3 (2012), 581–611
2. Anderson, R. Lanier: “Nietzsche on Autonomy,” in John Richardson / Ken Gemes (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche, Oxford 2013, 432–60
3. Anderson, R. Lanier: “What is a Nietzschean Self?,” in Christopher Janaway / Simon Robertson (eds.), Nietzsche, Naturalism, and Normativity, Oxford 2012, 202–35
4. Bamford, Rebecca: “Moraline-Free Virtue: The Case of Free Death,” The Journal of Value Inquiry 49/3 (2015), 437–51
5. Battin, Margaret: Ending Life: Ethics and the Way We Die, Oxford 2005