Affiliation:
1. University of Iceland Department of Philosophy 101 Reykjavik Island
Abstract
Abstract
Recent discussions have connected Nietzsche’s philosophy of masculinity to the return of authoritarian politics. Neoconservative debates about masculinity, and right-wing extremism, explicitly refer back to Nietzsche’s philosophy and often present democratization, a feminization of society, and political correctness as responsible for a weakening of masculinity. One example for this reception of Nietzsche’s writings is Jordan Peterson’s psychological diagnosis of a presumed crisis of masculinity. This article undertakes a comparison of Nietzsche’s philosophy of masculinities with Peterson’s neo-Jungian psychology of masculinity in the context of recent conceptualizations of patriarchy, misogyny, and gendered forms of ressentiment. This comparison will highlight that Nietzsche’s conception of masculinity is more complex, and has philosophically more to offer, than neoconservative ideas about masculinity that onesidedly foreground male strength. Finally it will be pointed out how a Jungian analysis discloses aspects of the Dionysian that are of relevance to contemporary gender studies of Nietzsche’s philosophy.
Reference35 articles.
1. Baeumler, Alfred: Nietzsche, der Philosoph und Politiker, Leipzig 1931
2. Beiner, Ronald: Dangerous Minds. Nietzsche, Heidegger and the Return of the Far Right, Philadelphia, PA 2018
3. Bishop, Paul: The Dionysian Self. C. G. Jung’s Reception of Friedrich Nietzsche, Berlin 1995
4. Butler, Judith: Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York 1990
5. Callaghan, Greg: „Right-Winger? Not Me, Says Alt-Right Darling Jordan Peterson“, in: New York Times (19.04.2018), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/style/jordan-peterson-12-rules-for-life.html
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献