The Will to Synthesis: Nietzsche, Carnap and the Continental-Analytic Gap

Author:

Moreira Felipe G. A.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Miami Department of Philosophy 1252 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, Florida, 33124-4670 Florida USA

Abstract

AbstractThis essay presupposes that Friedrich Nietzsche and Rudolf Carnap champion contrasting reactions to the fact that, throughout history, persons have been engaged in metaphysical disputes. Nietzsche embraces a libertarian reaction that is in agreement with his anti-democratic aristocratic political views, whereas Carnap endorses an egalitarian reaction aligned with his democratic and socialist political views. After characterizing these reactions, the essay argues for two claims. The first claim is that the stated contrasting reactions are to be considered, not only by the few scholars who are interested both in Nietzsche’s and Carnap’s writings, but by a far larger group that includes those who have addressed the continental-analytic gap; those who are concerned with the development of contemporary philosophy; and/or those who are interested in the writings of Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, David Lewis and/or Peter van Inwagen. The second claim is that we have to entertain a synthesis of Nietzsche’s libertarian and Carnap’s egalitarian reaction in order to overcome the continental-analytic gap.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Philosophy

Reference51 articles.

1. Apel, Karl-Otto: Selected Essays, vol. II: Ethics and the Theory of Rationality, Atlantic Highlands, NJ 1996

2. Carnap, Rudolf: Intellectual Autobiography, in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, ed. Paul Arthur Schilpp, La Salle, IL 1963, 3–86

3. Carnap, Rudolf: Logical Syntax of Language, trans. Amethe Smeaton, London 1937

4. Carnap, Rudolf: “The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language”, in Logical Positivism, ed. A. J. Ayer, trans. Arthur Pap, New York 1959, 60–81

5. Carnap, Rudolf: The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, trans. Rolf A. George, Chicago 2003

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. TO BE OR NOT TO BE “SUBTLY” PHILOSOPHICALLY COLONIZED*;Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia;2022-01

2. Anselm, Intuition and God’s Existence;Philosophia;2021-07-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3