Detection capacity of small intestine bacterial or methanogen overgrowth by lactose and fructose breath testing in the adult population

Author:

Laserna Mendieta Emilio José12345ORCID,Martín Dominguez Verónica36ORCID,Pérez Lucendo Irene2ORCID,Granero Cremades Inmaculada2,Ferreirós Martínez Raquel2ORCID,Álvarez Malé Tomás36ORCID,Sanz De Benito María Ángeles2,Santander Cecilio3567ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Gastroenterology Research Unit , Hospital General de Tomelloso , Tomelloso , Ciudad Real , Spain

2. Service of Clinical Laboratory , Hospital Universitario La Princesa , Madrid , Spain

3. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa , Madrid , Spain

4. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM) , Toledo , Spain

5. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd) , Madrid , Spain

6. Department of Gastroenterology , Hospital Universitario La Princesa , Madrid , Spain

7. Department of Medicine , Universidad Autónoma de Madrid , Madrid , Spain

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Exhaled breath tests (BTs) are the main diagnostic method for fructose and lactose malabsorption/intolerance (FI and LI, respectively) and for detecting small intestine bacterial or methanogen overgrowth (SIBO/IMO). Although FI/LI-BTs may provide evidence of the presence of SIBO/IMO, there is limited literature evaluating their reliability for this purpose. The objective of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of FI/LI-BTs in detecting SIBO and their concordance with SIBO-BTs in the identification of IMO. Methods In this retrospective observational study, FI/LI-BTs and SIBO-BTs performed in the same patients within a period of 6 weeks were selected from 652 gas chromatography-based BTs. Results A total of 146 BTs from 67 eligible adult patients were identified. LI-BTs had higher specificity than FI-BT in detecting SIBO (93.8 % vs. 72.7 %). In contrast, FI-BTs showed higher sensitivity (60.0 % vs. 28.6 %) as FI was more frequently established in SIBO-positive patients (70 % vs. 29 %). With regard to IMO, concordance with LI-BT was 100 %, with a 27 % of false negatives on FI-BTs. Conclusions Findings suggestive of SIBO or IMO on LI-BTs were highly consistent with those of SIBO-BTs. In contrast, the rate of false positives for SIBO and the rate of false negative for IMO on FI-BTs was 27 % in both cases.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3