Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease
Author:
Janeiro Manuel H.12, Ardanaz Carlos G.12, Sola-Sevilla Noemí12, Dong Jinya12, Cortés-Erice María12, Solas Maite12, Puerta Elena12, Ramírez María J.12
Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition , University of Navarra , Pamplona , Spain 2. IDISNA, Navarra’s Health Research Institute , Pamplona , Spain
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease. AD is the main cause of dementia worldwide and aging is the main risk factor for developing the illness. AD classical diagnostic criteria rely on clinical data. However, the development of a biological definition of AD using biomarkers that reflect the underling neuropathology is needed.
Content
The aim of this review is to describe the main outcomes when measuring classical and novel biomarkers in biological fluids or neuroimaging.
Summary
Nowadays, there are three classical biomarkers for the diagnosis of AD: Aβ42, t-Tau and p-Tau. The diagnostic use of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers is limited due to invasive collection by lumbar puncture with potential side effects. Plasma/serum measurements are the gold standard in clinics, because they are minimally invasive and, in consequence, easily collected and processed. The two main proteins implicated in the pathological process, Aβ and Tau, can be visualized using neuroimaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography.
Outlook
As it is currently accepted that AD starts decades before clinical symptoms could be diagnosed, the opportunity to detect biological alterations prior to clinical symptoms would allow early diagnosis or even perhaps change treatment possibilities.
Funder
Subprograma Estatal de Generacion del Conocimiento, Micinn
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference68 articles.
1. Jack, CR, Bennett, DA, Blennow, K, Carrillo, MC, Dunn, B, Haeberlein, SB, et al.. NIA-AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement 2018;14:535–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018. 2. Jack, CR, Bennett, DA, Blennow, K, Carrillo, MC, Feldman, HH, Frisoni, GB, et al.. A/T/N: an unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers. Neurology 2016;87:539–47, https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000002923. 3. Robinson, R, Amin, B, Guest, P. Multiplexing biomarker methods, proteomics and considerations for Alzheimer’s disease. In: Guest, P, editor. Proteomic methods in neuropsychiatric research; 2017, vol 974, pp. 24–37. 4. Ortega, RL, Dakterzada, F, Arias, A, Blasco, E, Naudí, A, Garcia, FP, et al.. Usefulness of CSF biomarkers in predicting the progression of amnesic and nonamnesic mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Aging Sci 2019;12:35–42, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874609812666190112095430. 5. Olsson, B, Lautner, R, Andreasson, U, Öhrfelt, A, Portelius, E, Bjerke, M, et al.. CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:673–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(16)00070-3.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|