Estimation of change limits (deltacheck) in clinical laboratory

Author:

Castro-Castro Maria-José1,Sánchez-Navarro Lourdes1

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Laboratory , Bellvitge University Hospital , Barcelona , Catalonia , Spain

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Change limits, more commonly called delta check, are those in which a change in a patient’s measured result in relation to their corresponding preceding measurement is suspected of being erroneous and should be considered as a doubtful result. The aim of this study was to provide change limits for some biochemical and haematological quantities to detect doubtful measured results and to assess its effectiveness to detect erroneous results for their application in and the standardization of the plausibility control. Methods Change limits have been estimated for 13 biochemical and 6 haematological quantities. For each quantity, relative differences (D), expressed as a percentage between the two consecutive measured results from the same patient (from scheduled laboratory requests), were calculated. From these differences (D), the p5 and p95 percentiles of the data distribution were calculated. To assess the effectiveness of the change limits to detect laboratory errors, 43 erroneous laboratory reports, containing different biochemical and haematological quantities, were obtained from the standard laboratory plausibility control procedure. Results From the 43 erroneous laboratory reports, 31 (72%) were due to endovenous administration errors and 12 (28%) were due to mislabeling errors. All erroneous laboratory reports were detected when the change limits of the quantities were combined and applied together. Conclusions The best combination of quantities, which detect all the erroneous reports in the same specimen were: potassium, albumin, creatinine, glucose and haemoglobin.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference29 articles.

1. Fuentes Arderiu, X, Basart Arraut, M, Bosch Ferrer, A, Castiñeiras Lacambra, M, López Martínez, R, Miro Balagué, J. Proposed guidelines for the final review of measurement results in the clinical laboratory. Accred Qual Assur 2008;13:537–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-008-0430-6.

2. Fuentes, X, Ferrer, ÀB. Guia per a la revisió final dels resultats de mesura en el laboratori clínic. Assoc Catalana Ciències Lab Clínic Vitr Verit 2008;9:1–20.

3. Harm, K, Wegener, M, Dieckvoß, E, Nage, l H, Voigt, K. Palusibility control in clinical chemistry results. Fresenius’ Z für Anal Chem 1982;311:320. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00481681.

4. Büttner, J, Stamm, D. Plausibilitätskontrolle. Ärztliche Verwndung von Klin Befunden Greiling H, Gressner AM (Hrsg) Lehrb der Klin Chemie und Pathobiochemie 3 Aufl. Stuttgard: Schattauer Verlag; 1995:74–7 pp.

5. Fuentes Arderiu, X, Castro Castro, MJ, Sánchez Navarro, L, Dot Bach, D. Validació i control de la plausibilitat dels resultats. Vitr Verit 2013;14:1431–7.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3