Affiliation:
1. Clinical Laboratory , Bellvitge University Hospital , Barcelona , Catalonia , Spain
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Change limits, more commonly called delta check, are those in which a change in a patient’s measured result in relation to their corresponding preceding measurement is suspected of being erroneous and should be considered as a doubtful result. The aim of this study was to provide change limits for some biochemical and haematological quantities to detect doubtful measured results and to assess its effectiveness to detect erroneous results for their application in and the standardization of the plausibility control.
Methods
Change limits have been estimated for 13 biochemical and 6 haematological quantities. For each quantity, relative differences (D), expressed as a percentage between the two consecutive measured results from the same patient (from scheduled laboratory requests), were calculated. From these differences (D), the p5 and p95 percentiles of the data distribution were calculated. To assess the effectiveness of the change limits to detect laboratory errors, 43 erroneous laboratory reports, containing different biochemical and haematological quantities, were obtained from the standard laboratory plausibility control procedure.
Results
From the 43 erroneous laboratory reports, 31 (72%) were due to endovenous administration errors and 12 (28%) were due to mislabeling errors. All erroneous laboratory reports were detected when the change limits of the quantities were combined and applied together.
Conclusions
The best combination of quantities, which detect all the erroneous reports in the same specimen were: potassium, albumin, creatinine, glucose and haemoglobin.
Reference29 articles.
1. Fuentes Arderiu, X, Basart Arraut, M, Bosch Ferrer, A, Castiñeiras Lacambra, M, López Martínez, R, Miro Balagué, J. Proposed guidelines for the final review of measurement results in the clinical laboratory. Accred Qual Assur 2008;13:537–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-008-0430-6.
2. Fuentes, X, Ferrer, ÀB. Guia per a la revisió final dels resultats de mesura en el laboratori clínic. Assoc Catalana Ciències Lab Clínic Vitr Verit 2008;9:1–20.
3. Harm, K, Wegener, M, Dieckvoß, E, Nage, l H, Voigt, K. Palusibility control in clinical chemistry results. Fresenius’ Z für Anal Chem 1982;311:320. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00481681.
4. Büttner, J, Stamm, D. Plausibilitätskontrolle. Ärztliche Verwndung von Klin Befunden Greiling H, Gressner AM (Hrsg) Lehrb der Klin Chemie und Pathobiochemie 3 Aufl. Stuttgard: Schattauer Verlag; 1995:74–7 pp.
5. Fuentes Arderiu, X, Castro Castro, MJ, Sánchez Navarro, L, Dot Bach, D. Validació i control de la plausibilitat dels resultats. Vitr Verit 2013;14:1431–7.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献