Use of point-of-care glucometers during an oral glucose tolerance test in children for prediabetes and diabetes diagnosis: a comparison study
Author:
Fabre-Estremera Blanca1ORCID, Martínez-Chávez Estéfani1ORCID, Manzano Ocaña Marta1ORCID, Carcavilla Urquí Atilano2ORCID, Morales Sánchez María de los Ángeles2ORCID, Pinilla Tejado Inmaculada2ORCID, González-Casado Isabel2ORCID, Losantos García Itsaso3ORCID, Fernández-Calle Pilar1ORCID, Buño Soto Antonio1ORCID, Oliver Paloma1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Laboratory Medicine , La Paz University Hospital , Madrid , Spain 2. Department of Pediatrics Endocrinology , La Paz University Hospital , Madrid , Spain 3. Department of Biostatistics , La Paz University Hospital , Madrid , Spain
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Despite clinical guidelines do not recommend the use of point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers for diagnostic purposes yet, the analytical performance is continuously improving. Thus, we evaluate the technical accuracy and clinical concordance of POCT glucometers during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in children for prediabetes and diabetes diagnosis in a comparison study.
Methods
Pediatric patients with an OGTT indication who attended the Diabetes Unit between December 2020 and September 2021 were recruited for this prospective observational study. During the functional test, glycaemia was immediately measured in venous blood using two glucometers (unconnected and connected) and sent to the central laboratory.
Results
The study included 98 patients. There was a high correlation between the glucometers and the central laboratory (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.912 and 0.950, for unconnected and connected glucometer, respectively). The median OGTT turnaround time (TAT) was significantly decreased (connected glucometer: 2.02 h [interquartile range, 2.00–2.07], central laboratory: 11.63 h [6.09–25.80]), with similar overall cost. The diagnostic concordance between connected glucometer and the central laboratory was 71.1 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 61.5–79.2). The clinical decision would have been the same in the 92.8 % of the cases, but treatment would have not been indicated in 4 patients (4.1 %).
Conclusions
POCT glucometers have demonstrated a high correlation and an acceptable diagnostic concordance with the central laboratory during an OGTT, as well the connected device offers a significant decrease in TAT, without increasing costs. However, as severe clinical impact could happen, POCT glucometers may not be used for diagnosis yet.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Medical Laboratory Technology,Education,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference26 articles.
1. American Diabetes Association. Introduction: standards of medical care in diabetes – 2022. Diabetes Care 2021;45:S1–2. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-sint. 2. Mayer-Davis, EJ, Kahkoska, AR, Jefferies, C, Dabelea, D, Balde, N, Gong, CX, et al.. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2018;19:7–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12773. 3. World Health Organization and International Diabetes Federation. HEARTS D: diagnosis and management of type 2 diabetes. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Asociation; 2020. 4. Salacinski, AJ, Alford, M, Drevets, K, Hart, S, Hunt, BE. Validity and reliability of a glucometer against industry reference standards. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014;8:95–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296813514315. 5. Rush, E, Crook, N, Simmons, D. Point-of-care testing as a tool for screening for diabetes and pre-diabetes. Diabet Med 2008;25:1070–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02526.x.
|
|