Data management of process plants as complex systems: systematic literature review and identification of challenges and opportunities
Author:
Layer Max1ORCID, Leidich Jonathan2ORCID, Schwoch Sebastian3ORCID, Saske Bernhard3ORCID, Neubert Sebastian1, Robl Peter2, Paetzold-Byhain Kristin3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Siemens Energy GmbH & Co.KG , Erlangen , Germany 2. Siemens AG , Munich , Germany 3. Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Led by the manufacturing industry, virtual replicas of production systems also known as digital twins (DTs) are gradually moving into all areas of industry. Their advantages are characterized by the possibility of product optimization, simulations, improved monitoring and prediction of downtimes and optimized maintenance, to name just a few. The engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) of process plants as mechatronic systems is characterized by a high degree of project-specific modifications and interdisciplinary engineering effort with low reusability, in contrast to unit-production-driven areas such as automotive. This results in a high cost-benefit ratio for the creation of DTs over the life cycle of process plants, especially when suppliers are integrated into the value chain. The objective of this paper is to analyze the state of plant lifecycle management, data exchange and the possibilities of optimized supplier integration during the planning and EPC of process plants regarding DT creation and usage. Three research questions (RQs) were used to narrow down a total of 356 identified publications to 54, which were then examined. The papers covered a variety of topics, including combining discipline-specific models, plant management approaches and the combination of both.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
General Chemical Engineering
Reference105 articles.
1. Abburu, S., Berre, A.J., Jacoby, M., Roman, D., Stojanovic, L., and Stojanovic, N. (2020). COGNITWIN – hybrid and cognitive digital twins for the process industry. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Cardiff, UK, pp. 1–8. 2. Abramovici, M., Savarino, P., Göbel, J.C., Adwernat, S., and Gebus, P. (2018). Systematization of virtual product twin models in the context of smart product reconfiguration during the product use phase. Proc. CIRP 69: 734–739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.025. 3. Adamenko, D., Kunnen, S., Pluhnau, R., and Nagarajah, A. (2019). An approach for knowledge-based requirements definition for re-engineering of the process plant. In: 2019 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), 8–11 April, Orlando, FL, USA, pp. 1–8. 4. Adwernat, S., Wolf, M., and Gerhard, D. (2020). Optimizing the design review process for cyber-physical systems using virtual reality. Proc. CIRP 91: 710–715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.115. 5. Aiello, O., Del Kandel, D.S.R., Chaudemar, J.-C., Poitou, O., and Saqui-Sannes, P.de (2021). Populating MBSE models from MDAO analysis. In: 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), 13 September – 13 October, Vienna, Austria, pp. 1–8.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|