Affiliation:
1. Institute of Behavioural Sciences and Communication Theory , Corvinus University of Budapest , Budapest , Hungary
2. Centre for Social Sciences , Hungarian Academy of Sciences , Budapest , Hungary
Abstract
Abstract
When it comes to metaphorical conceptualizations of life, previous cognitive linguistic research has identified cultural history as the single most important factor in the selection of the source domain. Accordingly, Hungary had to constantly battle for survival, prompting Hungarians to think of life primarily in terms of struggle and compromise, resulting in a more negative mindset towards life. We investigated the validity of this claim by drawing on a nationwide survey of Hungarian teenagers. Three main findings of the research are presented in the paper. First, the identified metaphors were of a general character and no particularly prevalent, negative conceptualizations emerged; Hungarian teenagers conceptualize life primarily as game, food, journey, challenge, plant and rollercoaster. Second, social factors – type and location of school, socio-economic status and media consumption – can have an effect on the selection of source domains, thus lessening the importance of cultural history in shaping metaphorical conceptualizations of life. Third, social factors influence speakers’ overall inclination toward metaphorical usage. Our results suggest that inclination to verbalize metaphorical conceptualizations is not all-pervasive throughout the whole linguistic community, but is constrained by type of school (at the secondary level), mother’s level of education, academic performance and reading habits.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Language and Linguistics
Reference39 articles.
1. Arriaga, R. J., L. Fenson, T. Cronan & S. J. Pethick. 1998. Scores on the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory of children from low- and middle-income families. Applied Psycholinguistics 19. 209–223.
2. Dirven, René. 2005. Major strands in cognitive linguistics. In Francisco José Ruiz De Mendoza Ibáñez & M. S. Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, 17–68. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Dollaghan, C. A., T. F. Campbell, J. L. Paradise, H. M. Feldman, J. E. Janosky & D. N. Pitcairn. 1999. Maternal education and measures of early speech and language. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 42. 1432–1443.
4. Ensminger, Margaret E. & Kate E. Fothergill. 2003. A decade of measuring SES: What it tells us and where to go from here. In Marc H. Bornstein & Robert H. Bradley (eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development, 13–27. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Geeraerts, Dirk, Gitte Kristiansen & Yves Peirsman. 2010a. Introduction: Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. In Dirk Geeraerts, Gitte Kristiansen & Yves Peirsman (eds.), Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics, 1–19. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献