Affiliation:
1. Research Centre for Language and Cognition , Shenzhen University , Shenzhen City , PR China
2. School of Education, Communication & Society , King’s College London , London , UK
Abstract
Abstract
This study explores the relationship between language and thought in similarity judgments by testing how monolingual children who speak languages with partial typological differences in motion description (English and Chinese) respond to visual motion event stimuli. Participants were either Chinese- or English-speaking, 3-year-olds, 8-year-olds and adults (32 in each group) who judged the similarity between caused motion scenes in a match-to-sample task. The results suggest, first of all, that the two younger groups of 3-year-olds are predominantly path-oriented, irrespective of language, as evidenced by their significantly longer fixation on path-match videos rather than manner-match videos in a preferential looking scheme. Using categorical measurement of overt choices, older children and adults also showed a shared tendency of being more path-oriented. However, the analysis using continuous measurement of reaction time revealed significant variations in spatial cognition that can be related to linguistic differences: English speakers tended to be more manner-oriented while Chinese speakers were equally manner- and path-oriented. On the whole, our findings indicate a likelihood that children’s non-linguistic thought is similar prior to internalising the lexicalisation pattern of motion events in their native languages, but shows divergences after such habitual use, thus suggesting that the pattern of non-linguistic thought may be linked, among other things, to linguistic structure.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Language and Linguistics
Reference88 articles.
1. Allen, S., A. Özyürek, S. Kita, A. Brown, R. Furman, T. Ishizuka & M. Fujii. 2007. Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition 102(1). 16–48.
2. Ameka, F. K. & J. Essegbey. 2013. Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics 2(1). 19–38.
3. Athanasopoulos, P. & E. Bylund. 2013. Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science 37. 286–309.
4. Beavers, J., B. Levin & S. Tham. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46. 331–377.
5. Berman, R. & D. I. Slobin. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献