Affiliation:
1. Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS ), Langage, langues et cultures d’Afrique noire (LLACAN) , Villejuif , France
Abstract
Abstract
In spite of the growing body of research on frames of spatial reference, a number of important questions remain unanswered. This study explores reference frame use in Bashkir, based on a linguistic matching task and a nonverbal task. In the linguistic task, speakers relied freely on intrinsic and relative frames. In intrinsic descriptions, two different kinds of mapping were attested: a mapping based on the Ground’s function, and a mapping based on the Ground’s shape. Several factors were identified that affect the choice of linguistic description, including lexical choice, the chair’s orientation with respect to the viewer, and the speaker’s age. Interference from Russian was not a significant factor. The repair strategies speakers used when encountering misunderstanding suggest that they were not aware of the source of their difficulties. A number of previous studies reported, for different languages, a correlation between reference frame use in linguistic and nonlinguistic tasks, supporting the linguistic relativity hypothesis. The data from Bashkir shows no such correlation: nonverbal coding strategies did not correspond to the same individual’s linguistic strategies, but correlated with the use of Russian in linguistic descriptions. I interpret this finding tentatively as pointing toward a mediated relationship between spatial cognition and language.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Language and Linguistics
Reference42 articles.
1. Allan, Keith. 1995. The anthropocentricity of the English word(s) back. Cognitive Linguistics 6(1). 11–31.
2. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2008. Elicitation task: Frames of reference in discourse – The ball & chair pictures. In Gabriela Pérez Báez (ed.), MesoSpace: Spatial language and cognition in Mesoamerica, 2008, 34–37. Field Manual. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo– SUNY. http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jb77/MesoSpaceManual2008.pdf 24 June 2018.
3. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2011. Spatial frames of reference in Yucatec: Referential promiscuity and task-specificity. Language Sciences 33(6). 892–914.
4. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Katharine T. Donelson, Randi E. Moore, Elena Benedicto, Alyson Eggleston, Carolyn K. O’Meara, Gabriela Pérez Báez, Alejandra Capistrán Garza, Néstor Hernández Green, María de Jesús Selene Hernández Gómez, Samuel Herrera Castro, Enrique Palancar, Gilles Polian & Rodrigo Romero Méndez. 2015. The contact diffusion of linguistic practices: Reference frames in Mesoamerica. Language Dynamics and Change 5(2). 169–201.
5. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Carolyn O’Meara. 2012. Vectors and frames of reference: Evidence from Seri and Yucatec. In Luna Filipović & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures, 217–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献