Comparison of different CFD approaches for the simulation of developing free surface two-phase flow in straight and bent pipes

Author:

Döß Alexander1ORCID,Höhne Thomas1,Schubert Markus12,Hampel Uwe13

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Fluid Dynamics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf , Bautzner Landstr. 400, 01328 Dresden , Germany

2. Chair of Chemical Process Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden 01062 , Germany

3. Chair of Imaging Techniques in Energy and Process Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden 01062 , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Two-phase flows in feed pipes of thermal separation columns have complex flow patterns and are difficult to predict during sizing and design for geometries with non-straight pipes. Numerical simulation codes have only been validated for very few pipe geometries. This work benchmarks the state-of-the-art Volume-of-Fluid model (VoF) and the Algebraic Interfacial Area Density model (AIAD) for the simulation of two-phase flows with the Eulerian/Eulerian CFD approach for straight pipes and horizontal bends as well as for different pipe diameters and flow rates. Both models are compared and shortcomings of the predicted velocity fields from AIAD in the vicinity of horizontal bends are highlighted. While phase dynamics, e.g., for wavy or disperse flows, are not well reproduced by either model, the phase distribution patterns in straight tubes and bends agree reasonably well with experimental data. Regardless of the geometry, better void fraction prediction is obtained for higher flow velocities and the larger pipe diameter. From the numerical results, recommendations for the selection of feed inlet devices are derived.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Modeling and Simulation,General Chemical Engineering

Reference68 articles.

1. Kiss, AA. Advanced distillation technologies, 1st ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013.

2. Degance, AE, Atherton, RW. Chemical engineering aspects of two-phase flow Part 2 phase equilibria, flow regimes, energy loss. Chem Eng 1970;77:151–8.

3. Bothamley, M. Gas/liquid separators: quantifying separation performance – Part 1. Oil Gas Facil 2013;2:21–9. https://doi.org/10.2118/0813-0021-OGF.

4. Wehrli, M, Schaeffer, P, Marti, U, Muggli, F, Kooijman, H. Mixed-phase feeds in mass transfer columns and liquid separation. In: Distillation and absorption 2006 symposium series 152. Rugby, GB: IChemE; 2006:230–40 pp.

5. Döß, A, Schubert, M, Hampel, U, Mehringer, C, Geipel, C, Schleicher, E. Two‐phase flow morphology and phase fractions in larger feed line sections. Chem Ing Tech 2021;93:1134–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.202000209.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Scaling two-phase gas-liquid flow in horizontal pipes;Chemical Engineering Research and Design;2023-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3