Knowledge Management and Czech Self-Governments: Empirical Investigations into the Application of Knowledge Management to Public Administration in the Czech Republic

Author:

Špaček David1,Gatarik Eva1

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics and Administration , Masaryk University , Brno , Czech Republic .

Abstract

Abstract Although knowledge management has become the subject of an enormous quantity of articles and books in recent times, certain more problematic aspects of it remain neglected. Firstly, literature addressing knowledge management concentrates almost exclusively on business organizations and fails to provide details or recommendations adequate to effective application within the sphere of public administration. This holds especially true for Czech academic literature. Secondly, despite a reasonable number of articles on knowledge management in scientific journals, information about perceptions of knowledge-management activities, procedures and tools within organizations lacks detail. The purpose of this article is to investigate and summarize the activities, procedures and tools in use for dealing with knowledge within Czech self-governments and to discuss the main empirical findings. Although the quantitative survey herein does not provide fully representative data, it is still in a position to indicate that knowledge management in Czech public administration tends to be underdeveloped as well as undervalued.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Public Administration

Reference49 articles.

1. Alavi, M. and D. E. Leidner. 2001. “Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues.” MIS Quarterly 25(1), 107–136.

2. Allee, V. 2003. The Future of Knowledge: Increasing Prosperity Through Value Networks. Amsterdam et al.: Routledge.

3. Ammons, D. N. and D. J. Roenigk. 2015. “Performance Management in Local Government: Is Practice Influenced by Doctrine?” Public Performance & Management Review 38(3), 514–541.

4. Andriessen, D. G. 2008. “Stuffor Love? How Metaphors Direct our Efforts to Manage Knowledge in Organizations.” Knowledge Management Research & Practice 6(1), 5–12.

5. Bolisani, E. and M. Handzic (eds). 2015. Advances in Knowledge Management: Celebrating Twenty Years of Research and Practice. Heidelberg: Springer.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3