The effect of instruction on L2 learners’ ability to use verbal irony online

Author:

Prichard Caleb1ORCID,Rucynski John1,Gagatko Erin2

Affiliation:

1. Center for Language Education , 123305 Okayama University , Okayama , Japan

2. Global Teaching Institute, Tokyo International University , Tokyo , Japan

Abstract

Abstract As verbal irony, including jocular irony, is common in many cultures and since language learners have difficulty with it in the target language, L2 educators have made efforts to help learners recognize irony. However, empirical research on using verbal irony online is lacking. Using a pre-posttest, control group design, this study aimed to fill the research gap by examining the efficacy of instruction on the ability of L2 learners to use verbal irony effectively (e.g., saliently, humorously) in response to social media posts. Japanese learners of English (N = 77) were involved. The instruction focused on sociopragmatics (e.g., appropriate usage) and pragmalinguistic aspects (e.g., non-verbal irony cues). Two instruments of 42 mock social media posts each were created (e.g., “My boss just yelled at me even though it was HIS fault.”), and the participants were asked to choose 12 of these to respond ironically to. Two independent raters judged all 1,848 blinded responses for their overall quality. The irony types and cues were also coded by researchers. The findings suggested that the experimental group significantly improved their ability to use verbal irony appropriately and saliently. Compared to the control group, in the posttest they more often used irony in more appropriate contexts (e.g., in response to funny posts as opposed to saddening news). Moreover, they used more irony cues, and their irony was more often rated as funny in the posttest. Implications for teachers and researchers are discussed.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference45 articles.

1. Akimoto, Yoritaka & Shiho Miyazawa. 2017. Individual differences in irony use depend on context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36(6). 675–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x17706937.

2. Attardo, Salvatore. 2002. Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In Luigi Annolli, Rita Ciceri & Guiseppe Riva (eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication, 159–180. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

3. Bamman, David & Noah A. Smith. 2015. Contextualized sarcasm detection on Twitter. In The Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

4. Bell, Nancy & Anne Pomerantz. 2015. Humor in the classroom: A guide for language teachers and educational researchers. New York & London: Routledge.

5. Bruntsch, Richard & Willibald Ruch. 2017. Studying irony detection beyond ironic criticism: let’s include ironic praise. Frontiers in Psychology 8. 606. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00606.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3