Affiliation:
1. University of Connecticut , Storrs , USA
Abstract
Abstract
How much gender diversity is there among experts in the United States? This study focuses on witnesses who testified before four US Senate committees: Agriculture; Commerce, Science & Transportation; Foreign Relations; and Health, Education, Labor & Pensions. Across the 9072 witnesses (2003–15), women comprised 23.7% of witnesses. In terms of panels, 49.8% were male-only, 5.8% were female-only, and 44.4% were mixed gender. Although the overall numbers remain significantly low proportionate to the female share of the US population, there was an incremental increase in the proportion of women testifying and of mixed gender panels. Non-governmental organizations had the highest share of female witnesses. The percentage of female witnesses does vary with which party controls the Senate, with the average female share higher under Democratic control. These findings raise questions for further study about what factors influence the selection of witnesses for US Senate hearings and whether a similar lack of diversity exists in other identity categories such as race and ethnicity. The effort could also be extended to other committees in the Senate, as well as to the US House.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science
Reference14 articles.
1. Achen, C. 2014. “Why Do We Need Diversity in the Political Methodology Society?.” The Political Methodologist. April 30. https://thepoliticalmethodologist.com/2014/04/30/we-dont-just-teach-statistics-we-teach-students/.
2. Colgan, J. 2015. New Evidence on Gender Bias in IR Syllabi: Duck of Minerva. August 27. https://duckofminerva.com/2015/08/new-evidence-on-gender-bias-in-ir-syllabi.html.
3. Dion, M., J. Sumner, and S. M. Mitchell. 2018. “Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields.” Political Analysis 26 (3): 312–27, https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.12.
4. Gray, K. 2014. The Status of Women in the U.S. Media 2014. Report of the Women’s Media Center. Retrieved from https://www.womensmediacenter.com/pages/statistics.
5. Hardt, H., H. J. Kim, A. E. Smith, and P. Meister. 2019. “The Gender Readings Gap in Political Science Graduate Training.” The Journal of Politics 81 (4): 1528–32. On-line: July 12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429044595.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献