Interaction of Brilliant Blue dye solution with soil and its effect on mobility of compounds around the zones of preferenial flows at spruce stand
Author:
Bebej Juraj1, Homolák Marián1, Orfánus Tomáš2
Affiliation:
1. Technical University in Zvolen, Faculty of Forestry, T. G. Masaryka 24, SK – 960 53 Zvolen , Slovak Republic 2. Institute of Hydrology SAS, Račianska 75, SK – 831 02 Bratislava , Slovak Republic
Abstract
Abstract
We performed field experiment with 10 g l−1 concentration of Brilliant Blue solutes in 100 l of water sprinkling on 1 × 1 m surface of the Dystric Cambisol. Consequently, four vertical profiles were exposed at experimental plot after 2 hours (CUT 2), 24 hours (CUT 24), 27 hours (CUT 27) and after 504 hours (CUT 504) in order to analyse spatiotemporal interactions among the BB solution (Na-salts), soil exchangeable complex and fine earth soil (%) samples extracted from both the high and low coloured zones located around the optically visualised macropore preferred flow (PF) zones. The concentration changes were quantifying via soil profiles not affected by BB (termed as REF) located in the close vicinity of experimental plot. Observed changes in pH (H2O), chemical composition of fineearth soil, as well as in concentration of Na+ in soil exchangeable complex to suggest, the BB dye solution didn’t represent an inert tracer, but compounds strongly involved in reaction with surrounding soils. Recorded chemical trends seems to be the result both the competitive processes between the Na+ of BB dye solution and composition of surrounding soil exchangeable complex, as well and the spatial-temporal controlled mechanism of dye solution transfer in soil.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference47 articles.
1. Abrol, I. P., Yadav, J. S. P., Massoud, F. I., 1988: Salt- Affected Soils and their Management. FAO Soils Bulletin 39, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 131 p. 2. Alaoui, A., Goetz, B., 2008: Dye tracer and infiltration experiments to investigate macropore flow. Geoderma, 144:279-286. 3. Allaire, S. A., Roulier, S., Cessna, A. J., 2009: Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 378:179-204. 4. Anderson, H. A., Berrow, M. L., Farmer, V. C., Hepburn, A., Russel, J. D., Walker, W. J., 1982: A reassessment of podzol formation processes. Journal of Soil Science, 33:125-136. 5. Bebej, J., Homolák, M., Gregor, J., Škvarenina, J., 2013: The geophysical and geochemical interfaces in slope deposits and its implications regarding to spatial distribution of soil types and subtypes (in Slovak). In: Slaninka, I., Jurkovič, Ľ., Ďurža, O. (eds.): Geochémia, Bratislava, Štátny geologický ústav Dionýza Štúra, 1:10-13.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|