Author:
Niederstrasser Svenja Laura,Hammer Kerstin,Möllers Mareike,Falkenberg Maria Karina,Schmidt Rene,Steinhard Johannes,Klockenbusch Walter,Schmitz Ralf
Abstract
AbstractObjective:The aim of this study was to compare transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, transcervical chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis with respect to their total fetal loss rates.Methods:We retrospectively evaluated procedures of invasive prenatal testing performed during a 14-year period (2001–2014) including 936 amniocentesis procedures and 1051 chorionic villus samplings, of which 405 cases were executed transabdominally and 646 transcervically. Only singleton pregnancies before 24 weeks and 0 days of gestation where the pregnancy outcome was known were included. Fetal loss was defined as an abortion occurring either before 24 weeks and 0 days of gestation or <2 weeks after the procedure.Results:The total fetal loss rates were determined to be 1.73% for transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, 2.01% for transcervical chorionic villus sampling and 1.18% for amniocentesis. No statistically noticeable differences between the total fetal loss rates of all three procedures were found (P=0.399).Conclusion:Our study has shown that chorionic villus sampling (either transabdominal or transcervical) and amniocentesis are equal methods for invasive prenatal testing with respect to their abortion risk.
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献