Affiliation:
1. École Pratique des Hautes Études – Paris Sciences & Lettres , Les Patios Saint-Jacques , 4–14 rue Ferrus , Paris , France
Abstract
Abstract
The modern representation of cuneiform literature as a creation depending on a religious discourse leads us to think that myths and rites have structured not only the institution of kingship, but also all Mesopotamian knowledge, as well as social life. If political ideology needed a religious support to explain the king’s authority and privileges, later textual traditions show that the same intellectuals working for the royal court and urban elites developed at the same time, beyond religion, an alternative conception of their own power as knowledge and control of history, through narration, and nature through “magic”, in order to change reality and the gods’ will.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,History,Language and Linguistics,Cultural Studies
Reference112 articles.
1. Abusch, T. (2002): Mesopotamian Witchcraft: Toward a History and Understanding of Babylonian Witchcraft Beliefs and Literature (AMD 5), Leiden.
2. Abusch, T. (2015): The Magical Ceremony Maqlû: A Critical Edition (AMD 10), Leiden.
3. Ambos, C. (2010): Ritual Healing and the Investiture of the Babylonian King. In: W.S. Saks/J. Quack/J. Wienhold (ed.), The Problem of Ritual Efficacy, Oxford, 17—44.
4. Ambos, C. (2013): Rites of Passage in Ancient Mesopotamia: Changing Status by Moving through Space: bīt rimki and the Ritual of the Substitute King. In: C. Ambos et al. (ed.), Approaching Rituals in Ancient Culture. Questioni di rito: rituali come fonte di conoscenza delle religioni e delle concezioni del mondo nelle culture antiche. Proceedings of the Conference, November 28–30, 2011, Roma (RSO NS 86 Suppl. 2), Pisa – Rome, 39–54.
5. Annus, A. (2001): The Standard Babylonian Epic of Anzu (SAACT 3), Helsinki.