Media panic, medical discourse and the smartphone

Author:

Madsen Lian Malai1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates a space of upset related to the smartphone with its communicative affordances and implications. The notion of moral panic can be seen as a way of conceptualizing spaces of upset and their discursive frames. Informed by this concept and accounts of the panic discourses particularly directed at media, I examine the upset articulated in Danish media panic discourses, which grants authority from a medical perspective. In addition, I draw on the concept of medicalization and discuss how it becomes sayable within the space of upset related to digitally mediated communication that human interaction through a technological device is not (always) communication, but habit or addiction, to unpack the socio-cultural and sociolinguistic assumptions and implications of this perspective. Empirically, the article focuses on a particularly preeminent voice in the public debate in Denmark about the impact of social media and smartphone use, namely the voice of a medical doctor who has been granted the authority as “digital health expert” and frequently appears in Danish print, broadcast and social media.

Funder

Det Frie Forskningsråd

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference26 articles.

1. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London/New York: SAGE.

2. Blum-Ross, Alicia & Sonia Livingstone. 2016. Families and screen time: Current advice and emerging research. Media Policy Brief 17. London: Media Policy Project, London School of Economics and Political Science.

3. Blum-Ross, Alicia & Sonia Livingstone. 2018. The trouble with “screen time” rules. In Giovanna Mascheroni, Cristina Ponte & Ana Jorge (eds.), Digital parenting. The challenges for families in the digital age, 179–187. Göteborg: Nordicom.

4. Buckingham, David & Helle Strandgaard Jensen. 2012. Beyond “media panics”. Journal of Children and Media 6(4). 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2012.740415.

5. Cohen, Stanley. 1999. Moral panics and folk concepts. Paedagogica Historica 35(3). 585–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/0030923990350302.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3