The Magnitude and Direction of Collider Bias for Binary Variables

Author:

Nguyen Trang Quynh1,Dafoe Allan2,Ogburn Elizabeth L.3

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Departments of Mental Health and of Biostatistics , Baltimore, MD , USA

2. University of Oxford , Center for the Governance of AI , Oxford , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

3. Johns Hopkins University , Department of Biostatistics , Baltimore, MD , USA

Abstract

Abstract Suppose we are interested in the effect of variable X on variable Y. If X and Y both influence, or are associated with variables that influence, a common outcome, called a collider, then conditioning on the collider (or on a variable influenced by the collider – its “child”) induces a spurious association between X and Y, which is known as collider bias. Characterizing the magnitude and direction of collider bias is crucial for understanding the implications of selection bias and for adjudicating decisions about whether to control for variables that are known to be associated with both exposure and outcome but could be either confounders or colliders. Considering a class of situations where all variables are binary, and where X and Y either are, or are respectively influenced by, two marginally independent causes of a collider, we derive collider bias that results from (i) conditioning on specific levels of the collider or its child (on the covariance, risk difference, and in two cases odds ratio, scales), or (ii) linear regression adjustment for, the collider or its child. We also derive simple conditions that determine the sign of such bias.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Epidemiology

Reference32 articles.

1. Angrist, J. D., and A. B. Krueger. 1999. “Empirical strategies in labor economics,” in Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 3 (Part A), Chapter 23,. edited by O. C. Ashenfelter, and D. Card,, Vol. 3, 1277–1366. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

2. Banack, H. R., and Kaufman, J. S. (2013). The “obesity paradox” explained. Epidemiology, 24(3):461–462.

3. Berkson, J. (1946). Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(3):47–53.

4. Chaudhuri, S., and Richardson, T. (2002). Using the structure of d-connecting paths as a qualitative measure of the strength of dependence. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 116–123. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

5. Cole, S. R., R. W. Platt, E. F. Schisterman, H. Chu, D. Westreich, D. Richardson, and C. Poole. 2010. “International Journal of Epidemiology.” Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider 39 (2): 417–420. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp334. .

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3