Abstract
Abstract
One of the questions that scholarly publishers have faced as a result of the increasing interest in research data is the relationship of journal articles to the research data behind those articles. From the 1970s forward, journals in the physical sciences published research data in the form of supplemental materials. Due to economic considerations and the sheer volume of data, this supplemental material was generally distributed in microform. In the late 1990s, some publishers began experimenting with digital distribution of research data. By the early 2000s, the volume of research data being submitted was causing problems for editors and reviewers. This tension was captured well in an editorial by Emilie Marcus in Cell in 2009. [1]
Reference21 articles.
1. Emilie Marcus, Taming Supplemental Material, Cell 139(1):11, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.021
2. Ralph H. Müller, Computer center for basic physical science data proposed, Anal. Chem. 30(8):55A, 1958. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60140a754
3. Zachary D. Stephens, et al, Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical?, PLOS Biology, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002195
4. http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/, http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406117.html, www.bio-rad.com/en-us/spectroscopy, www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/solutions/csd-system/components/csd/, https://icsd.fiz-karlsruhe.de, www.rcsb.org/pdb/home/home.do, Accessed 17 April 2017.
5. Sean Bechhofer, et al, Research Objects: Towards Exchange and Reuse of Digital Knowledge, Nature Precedings, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2010.4626.1.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献