Affiliation:
1. Institut für Anglistik/Amerikanistik , Friedrich-Schiller-Universität , Fürstengraben 1, 07737, Jena Germany
Abstract
Summary
This study tests the morphological gradience theory on Russian prefixed verbs. With the help of a specially designed experiment, I offer evidence that verbs with prefixes that have prepositional counterparts and verbs with prefixes that exist only as bound morphemes reveal significant differences in terms of their morphological decomposition. In the pronunciation of native speakers, there tends to be a significantly longer silent period between prepositional prefixes and bases than between unprepositional prefixes and bases due to the compositional nature of the former and the non-compositional nature of the latter. Drawing on these findings, I contend that Russian prefixed verbs can be analysed as constructional schemas and that the degree of their morphological decomposition depends upon the different levels of activation of their sequential and lexical links.
Reference38 articles.
1. Arkadiev, Peter & Andrey Shluinsky. 2015. Verb-Classifying Aspectual Systems: Towards a Typology. Vestnik SPbGU 3. 4–24.
2. Aylett, Matthew & Alice Turk. 2004. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47. 31–56.
3. Baayen, R. Harald & Robert Schreuder. 2000. Towards a psycholinguistic computational model for morphological parsing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 358. 1–3.
4. Bell, Alan & Jurafsky, Daniel & Fosler-Lussier, Eric & Girand, Cynthia & Gregory, Michelle & Daniel Gildea. 2003. Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 113: 1001–1024.
5. Bergsma, Shane & Bhargava, Aditya & He, Hua & Grzegorz Kondrak. 2010. Predicting the Semantic Compositionality of Prefix Verbs. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 293–303.