Affiliation:
1. Associate Professor, Dipartimento di Lettere, Lingue e Beni Culturali , Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Cagliari , Italy Italy
Abstract
Summary
In this article, I analyze instances of Ukrainian poetry written between Taras Ševčenko’s death and the establishment of modernism that deal with the theme of the precarity of Ukrainian literature as a consequence of the lack of a Ukrainian nation in those times. On the basis of examples drawn from the works of Pantelejmon Kuliš, Lesja Ukrajinka, Mychajlo Staryc’kyj, Borys Hrinčenko, Volodymyr Samijlenko, Volodymyr Šaškevyč, and Ivan Franko, I aim to show how Ukrainian poets of the second half of the 19th century tended to imagine the Ukrainian community as belonging to the past and/or the future, while its presence and its agency in the present are made impossible by imperial subjugation, hence making communication, including literary, impossible or powerless. In the final part of my article, I also reflect on the complex nexus between aesthetic judgment and the re-evaluation of Ukrainian literary history.
Reference38 articles.
1. Adan, Elizabeth & Benjamin Bateman. 2015. Emergent Precarities and Lateral Aesthetics. The minnesota review 85. 107–118.
2. Beardsley, Monroe C. 1981. Aesthetic Value in Literature. Comparative Literature Studies 18(3). 238–247.
3. Bilec’kyj, Oleksandr. 1924. Dvadcjat’ rokiv novoji ukrajins’koji liryky. Charkiv: Deržavne vydavnyctvo Ukrajiny.
4. Bondar, M. P. 1997. Poezija. In Jacenko, M. T. (ed.), Istorija ukrajins’koji literatury XIX stolittja. U tr’och knyhach. Knyha tretja: 70–90-ti roky XIX st., 161–205. Kyjiv: Lybid’.
5. Chernetsky, Vitaly. 2016. Silences and Displacements: Revisiting the Debate on Central European Literature from a Ukrainian Perspective. Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie 72(1). 69–84.