Motzen und Moral

Author:

Thielemann Nadine1,Göke Regina2,Savych Zlatoslava1

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Slavic Languages, Department of Foreign Language Business Communication , WU – Vienna University of Economics and Business , Welthandelsplatz 1, Gebäude D2 , Wien/Vienna Austria

2. Institute for Romance Languages, Department of Foreign Language Business Communication , WU – Vienna University of Economics and Business , Welthandelsplatz 1, Gebäude D2 , Wien/Vienna Austria

Abstract

Summary The paper analyses complaining behaviour at the workplace across several languages (French, German in Austria and in Germany, Polish and Russian). As speech acts, complaints deal with socially unacceptable actions that are brought up as problematic issues retrospectively. This may include critical evaluative assessment or the request for compensation. Data have been collected using an online discourse completion task (DCT) including discourse scenarios in which the power distance between the participants as well as the weight of the transgression/misconduct varied. The results show that complaining strategies vary along several dimensions (e. g. mention of transgression +/-, justification of complaint +/-, way in which a solution or compensation is requested). The observed differences in complaining strategies can be interpreted in terms of culture-specific ways in which the relationship at the workplace is conceived of. Despite the general restrictions of DCT as a method of data collection, we suggest utilizing data and results derived from their analysis in the context of courses of intercultural business communication and of business language courses.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Cultural Studies

Reference78 articles.

1. Antas, Jolanta. 2002. Polskie zasady grzeczności. In Grzegorz Szpila & Władysław Chłopicki (Hrsgg.), Zbiór referatów z Konferencji “Język Trzeciego Tysiąclecia II”: Kraków, 28 lutego-2 marca 2002 (Język a komunikacja 4), 347–363. Kraków: Krakowskie Tow. Popularyzowania Wiedzy o Komunikacji Językowej “Tertium”.

2. Arundale, Robert B. 2010. Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement. In Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8). 2078–2105. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021. Letzter Zugriff: 13.10.2020.

3. Arundale, Robert B. 2015. Face constituting theory. In Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie & Todd L. Sandel (Hrsgg.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1–9. Chichester, West Sussex, UK & Malden, MA, USA: Wiley Blackwell.

4. Bergmann, Jörg & Thomas Luckmann (Hrsgg.). 2013. Kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.

5. Bergmann, Jörg & Thomas Luckmann. 2013. Moral und Kommunikation. In Jörg Bergmann & Thomas Luckmann (Hrsgg.), Kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral, 13–57. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3