General location across languages: On the division of labour between functional and lexical items in spatial categories

Author:

Ursini Francesco-Alessio1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Chinese Language and Literature, Central China Normal University , No. 152 Luoyu Road , Wuhan , China

Abstract

Abstract In many languages, it is possible to describe the location of any entity with respect to a landmark object without specifying the exact place that the locatum occupies (e.g. English at in at home). Such vocabulary items usually contrast with items that belong to the same categories but have more restricted senses (e.g. on top of in on top of the shelf). Thus, the degree of “abstractness” that such spatial case markers can convey usually depends on the organization of the lexicon and grammar of spatial terms in each language. The goal of this paper is to explore these properties across a small sample of languages and offer an account of this variation that is connected to previous theories of spatial case markers (e.g. adpositions). Our key proposal is that the morpho-syntactic structure of spatial case markers and their phrases can license a clear division of labour between functional and lexical spatial senses. However, intermediate solutions blurring categories and semantic boundaries are shown to be possible. We formalize this proposal via a fragment of Lexical Syntax, and show that degrees of distinction between ‘functional’ and ‘lexical’ sense types and categories can be modelled via a unified account.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference167 articles.

1. Abondolo, David. 1998. Introduction. In David Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic languages, 3–30. London: Routledge.

2. Acedo-Matellán, Víctor. 2016. The Morphosyntax of transitions: A case study in Latin and other languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Aikenvhald Alexandra & Richard M. W. Dixon (eds.). 2006. Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Alekseev, Mikhail E. & Ramazan N. Rajabov. 1991. Tsez language. In Michael Job (ed.), Indigenous languages of the Caucasus, vol. 3, 70-101. Ann Arbor: Caravan Books.

5. Alekseev, Mikhail E. & Ramazan N. Rajabov. 1993. Prerequisites to the formation of Tsez writing system. In George Hewitt (ed.), Caucasian perspectives, 372–376. Munich: Lincom Europa.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3