Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking Theoretical and Geographical Boundaries-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking Theoretical and Geographical Boundaries

Published:2019-11-01 Issue:2 Volume:35 Page:271-283
ISSN:2512-1413
Container-title:Journal of Japanese Linguistics
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Yabuki-Soh Noriko¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Languages, Literatures and Linguistics , York University , 4700 Keele Street , Toronto , Ontario M3J 1P3 , Canada

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Education,Language and Linguistics

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jjl-2019-2014/pdf

Reference19 articles.

1. Comrie, Bernard 1996. The unity of noun modifying clauses in Asian languages. Pan-Asiatic Linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, January 8–10, 1996, 1077–1088. Salaya, Thailand: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University at Salaya.

2. Comrie, Bernard. 1998. Attributive clauses in Asian languages: Towards an areal typology. In Winfried Boeder, Christoph Schroeder, Karl Wagner & Wolfgang Wildgen (eds.), Sprache in raum und zeit: In memoriam Johannes Bechert, Band 2, 51–60. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

3. Comrie, Bernard. 2002. Typology and language acquisition: The case of relative clauses. In Anna Giacalone Ramat (ed.), Typology and second language acquisition, 19–37. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

4. Comrie, Bernard & Kaoru Horie. 1995. Complement clauses versus relative clauses: Some Khmer evidence. In Werner Abraham, T. Givón & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Discourse grammar and typology: Papers in honor of John W.M. Verhaar, 65–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

5. Eckman, Fred, Lawrence Bell & Diane Nelson. 1988. On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics 9(1). 1–20.10.1093/applin/9.1.1