Affiliation:
1. University of Oldenburg , Oldenburg , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
In previous studies comparing the intonation of questions and statements in German, greater f0 excursions of phrase-final rises have been associated with questions in both read speech and spontaneous speech. This holds for production studies as well as perception studies. However, a major question remains whether these differences are perceived categorically or continuously. Furthermore, we ask whether the differences in f0 scaling correspond to categorical linguistic functions or rather an attitudinal continuum. We conducted three different perception experiments: a classical categorical perception task, an imitation task, and a semantic evaluation task. The results suggest that f0 scaling in phrase-final rises is perceived as a phonetic continuum rather than in phonological categories. Furthermore, the gradual increase of the final rise is associated with a gradual increase in perceived questioning. Lastly, the phonetic cues to this degree of questioning are distinct from those to the other investigated meanings surprise and uncertainty. Accordingly, this study supports the assumption that questioning constitutes an attitudinal meaning in its own right.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Acoustics and Ultrasonics,Language and Linguistics
Reference61 articles.
1. Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Benjamin Bolker & Steven Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 1(67). 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003499.
2. Batliner, Anton. 1989. Wieviel Halbtöne braucht die Frage? Merkmale, Dimensionen, Kategorien. In Hans Altmann, Anton Batliner & Wilhelm Oppenrieder (eds.), Zur Intonation von Modus und Fokus im Deutschen, 111–153. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
3. Bernstein, Joshua G. W. & Andrew J. Oxenham. 2006. The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: Sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120(6). 3929–3945. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2372452.
4. Bierwisch, Manfred. 1966. Regeln für die Intonation deutscher Sätze. Studia Grammatica VII. 99–201.
5. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2013. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Available at: http://www.Fon.Hum.Uva.Nl/praat.