KPI-based standards benchmarking for the preference of different analytical approaches developed for simultaneous determination of ciprofloxacin and hydrocortisone: A SWOT case study

Author:

Nessim Christine1,El Hamd Mohamed23,Obaydo Reem4,Saleh Sarah5,Lotfy Hayam6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ahram Canadian University , 12566, 6th October , Cairo , Egypt

2. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Shaqra University , Shaqra 11961 , Saudi Arabia

3. Department of Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, South Valley University , Qena 83523 , Egypt

4. Department of Analytical and Food Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ebla Private University , 22743 , Idlib , Syria

5. Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA) , 6th October , 11787 , Egypt

6. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Future University in Egypt , Cairo , 11835 , Egypt

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to prefer the suitability of an analytical approach developed for simultaneously determining ciprofloxacin hydrochloride (CIP) and hydrocortisone (HYD) in their ear drop dosage form. The preference between the three known instruments was utilized, namely UV-spectrophotometry, reversed phase-high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC)-UV, and thin-layer chromatography (TLC)-densitometry. The instrumentational studies determined that the mathematical UV methods (utilized various manipulation designs such as the isoabsorptive point, absorbance ratio, extended ratio subtraction, ratio difference, and mean centering of ratio spectra) had linearities in the range of 2.0–14.0 and 1.0–14.0 µg·mL−1, the RP-HPLC-UV method showed a linearity range of 1.0–8.0 µg·mL−1, and the TLC-spectrodensitometric method had linearity ranges of 0.2–1.6 µg/band and 0.6–2.0 µg/band for both CIP and HYD, respectively. The analytical performance, validity, and greenness of the approaches were evaluated through the benchmarking of key performance indicator (KPI)-based standards and a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. The KPIs and SWOT study focused on several aspects, including (1) the selectivity and robustness of the methods, (2) sensitivity, (3) accuracy and precision, (4) applicability, (5) whiteness, (6) greenness, and (7) blueness. However, the assessment of whiteness, greenness, and blueness was conducted using well-known ecological assessment tools such as the RGB12 Algorithm, Analytical Eco-Scale, AGREE, GAPI, and Blue Applicability Grade Index. In conclusion, based on the findings, UV-spectrophotometry emerged as the most practically convenient approach. It demonstrated advantages based on the predetermined KPI-based standards. Furthermore, UV-spectrophotometry was deemed to be the most environmentally friendly option.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3