Affiliation:
1. University Dental Clinical Center, Dental Faculty , University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” , Skopje , Macedonia (the former Yugoslav Republic of)
Abstract
Abstract
A quality-made dental impression is a prerequisite for successful fixed-prosthodontic fabrication and is directly dependent on the dimensional stability, accuracy and flexibility of the elastomeric impression materials, as well as on the appropriately used impression techniques. The purpose of this paper is to provide a literature review of relevant scientific papers which discuss the use of various silicone impression materials, different impression techniques and to evaluate their impact on the dimensional stability and accuracy of the obtained impressions. Scientific papers and studies were selected according to the materials used, the sample size, impression technique, storage time, type of measurements and use of spacer for the period between 2002 and 2016. In the reviewed literature several factors that influence the dimensional stability and accuracy of silicone impression molds, including the choice of the type of viscosity, impression material thickness, impression technique, retention of the impression material on the tray, storage time before the casting, number of castings, hydrophilicity of the material, release of byproducts, contraction after polymerization, thermal contraction and incomplete elastic recovery were presented. The literature review confirmed the lack of standardization of methodologies applied in the research and their great diversity. All findings point to the superiority of the addition silicone compared to the condensation silicone.
Reference34 articles.
1. 1. Donovan TE, Chee WW. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2004 Apr;48(2):vi-vii, 445-70. Review.
2. 2. Islamova RM, Dobrynin MV, Ivanov DM, Vlasov AV, Kaganova EV, Grigoryan GV, Kukushkin VY. bis-Nitrile and bis-Dialkylcyanamide Platinum(II) Complexes as Efficient Catalysts for Hydrosilylation Cross-Linking of Siloxane Polymers. Molecules. 2016 Mar 5;21(3):311.
3. 3. Rubel BS. Impression materials: a comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2007 Jul;51(3):629-42, vi. Review.
4. 4. Gonçalves FS, Popoff DA, Castro CD, Silva GC, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials: a critical review of the literature. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2011 Dec;19(4):163-6. Review.
5. 5. Chen SY, Liang WM, Chen FN. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials. J Dent. 2004 Nov;32(8):603-9.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.04.002
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献