Abstract
Abstract
This paper develops a political-economic analysis of immigration in a host country that operates in a direct democracy regime. It shows that, in a monopolistic competitive environment with differentiated capital intensive goods, labor liberalization is more likely to come about in the societies that have more taste for variety. Moreover, in a host country with a strong preference for variety, workers and capital owners may share the same positive stance toward labor liberalization. It follows that the latter is impossible in a perfect competitive environment. Finally, in a dynamic inter-temporal setting with strategic voters, it demonstrates that the median voter is willing to accept fewer immigrants in the first period, in order to preserve her domestic political influence in the next period because of the naturalization of immigrants. In this way, the median voter maximizes her gains from immigration by accepting more immigrants in total.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Economics and Econometrics
Reference102 articles.
1. Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms;Review of Economic Studies,2007
2. Essays on Labor Liberalization and its Effects on diss Florida;Qirjo;World Economy International University,2010
3. The Causes and Effects of International Labor Mobility : Evidence from OECD Countries Research MPRA Paper No;Ortega;Human Development,2009
4. How Much Does Immigration Boost Innovation?;American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics,2010
5. Does Immigrant Employment Matter for Export Sales? Evidence from Denmark;Review of World Economics,2013