Microhistory, Conjectural Reasoning, and Prehistory: The Treasure of Aliseda (Spain)

Author:

Blanco-González Antonio1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Prehistory, Ancient History and Archaeology, University of Salamanca , Salamanca , 37011 , Spain

Abstract

Abstract This contribution delves into the ways of archaeological reasoning based on material remains, tackled as minute physical traces or signs capable of shedding light on underlying and otherwise unapproachable past phenomena. This is indeed the basis of Microhistory or the conjectural paradigm in History. This article identifies key characteristics regarding this way of inductive or “bottom-up” inference and demonstrates its prospects when applied to prehistoric contexts. To illustrate this point, the article draws on a case study from the protohistory of Iberia: The treasure of Aliseda (seventh–sixth centuries BCE). This one-off assemblage – a true anomaly in its time, past, and present – was accidentally found in 1920 and has thenceforth been subject to assorted interpretations – mainly as individual burial goods from a feminine tomb – using deductive reasoning constrained by strong prejudices. A recent and comprehensive revision of this issue from an inductive and multi-stranded approach – mobilising several independent lines of evidence – has led to a fresh, sounder, and finer-grained micro-narrative. This case exemplifies a successful microhistorical enquiry, which has tracked retrospectively an array of inadvertent observations – from legacy dataset, new fieldwork, and science-based analyses – to illuminate the deviant circumstances framing this occurrence.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference82 articles.

1. Anderson, T., Schum, D., & Twining, W. (2005). Analysis of evidence (2nd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2. Aranda Jiménez, G., Montón-Subías, A., & Sánchez Romero, M. (2015). The archaeology of Bronze Age Iberia. Argaric societies. New York: Routledge.

3. Beaudry, M. C. (2008). ‘Above vulgar economy’: The intersection of historical archaeology and microhistory in writing archaeological biographies of two New England merchants. In J. F. Brooks, C. R. N. DeCorse, & J. Walton (Eds.), Small worlds. Method, meaning, and narrative in microhistory (pp. 173–198). Santa Fe: School of Advanced Research Press.

4. Beck Jr R. A., Bolender, D. J., Brown, J. A., & Earle, T. K. (2007). Eventful archaeology. The place of space in structural transformation. Current Anthropology, 48(6), 833–860. doi: 10.1086/520974.

5. Bogaard, A. (2015). Lessons from modelling Neolithic farming practice: Methods of elimination. In R. W. Chapman & A. Wylie (Eds.), Material evidence. Learning from archaeological practice (pp. 243–254). New York: Routledge.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3