Affiliation:
1. Department of Prehistory, Ancient History and Archaeology, University of Salamanca , Salamanca , 37011 , Spain
Abstract
Abstract
This contribution delves into the ways of archaeological reasoning based on material remains, tackled as minute physical traces or signs capable of shedding light on underlying and otherwise unapproachable past phenomena. This is indeed the basis of Microhistory or the conjectural paradigm in History. This article identifies key characteristics regarding this way of inductive or “bottom-up” inference and demonstrates its prospects when applied to prehistoric contexts. To illustrate this point, the article draws on a case study from the protohistory of Iberia: The treasure of Aliseda (seventh–sixth centuries BCE). This one-off assemblage – a true anomaly in its time, past, and present – was accidentally found in 1920 and has thenceforth been subject to assorted interpretations – mainly as individual burial goods from a feminine tomb – using deductive reasoning constrained by strong prejudices. A recent and comprehensive revision of this issue from an inductive and multi-stranded approach – mobilising several independent lines of evidence – has led to a fresh, sounder, and finer-grained micro-narrative. This case exemplifies a successful microhistorical enquiry, which has tracked retrospectively an array of inadvertent observations – from legacy dataset, new fieldwork, and science-based analyses – to illuminate the deviant circumstances framing this occurrence.
Reference82 articles.
1. Anderson, T., Schum, D., & Twining, W. (2005). Analysis of evidence (2nd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Aranda Jiménez, G., Montón-Subías, A., & Sánchez Romero, M. (2015). The archaeology of Bronze Age Iberia. Argaric societies. New York: Routledge.
3. Beaudry, M. C. (2008). ‘Above vulgar economy’: The intersection of historical archaeology and microhistory in writing archaeological biographies of two New England merchants. In J. F. Brooks, C. R. N. DeCorse, & J. Walton (Eds.), Small worlds. Method, meaning, and narrative in microhistory (pp. 173–198). Santa Fe: School of Advanced Research Press.
4. Beck Jr R. A., Bolender, D. J., Brown, J. A., & Earle, T. K. (2007). Eventful archaeology. The place of space in structural transformation. Current Anthropology, 48(6), 833–860. doi: 10.1086/520974.
5. Bogaard, A. (2015). Lessons from modelling Neolithic farming practice: Methods of elimination. In R. W. Chapman & A. Wylie (Eds.), Material evidence. Learning from archaeological practice (pp. 243–254). New York: Routledge.